The role of Nature in managing Stress: In Everyday Life and Beyond

Logo: University of York

By Trish Darcy, Research Associate, University of York 

A sign saying 'take a breath' out in the countryside
Nature engagement during the Covid 19 pandemic to support wellbeing (Patricia Darcy)

Stress is a subjective experience occurring when an individual assesses the demands of the stressor to exceed their resources to cope with the stressor, resulting in biological, physiological, behavioural, and psychological changes for the individual (Lazarus & Folkman, 1984). While acute stress can be beneficial in the short-term e.g., preparation for an examination, chronic stress has been shown to have a negative impact on health and wellbeing. Specifically in relation to mental health, chronic stress is associated with increased levels of anxiety and depression (Hammen, 2005), and considered a risk factor in a range of physical health conditions (e.g., cancer, diabetes, CVD; (Cohen et al., 2007)).

Modern living is associated with a variety of stressors, for example, environmental stressors (e.g., air and noise pollution); lifestyle stressors (e.g., sedentary lifestyles, more time spent indoors); and personal stressors (e.g., impact of the cost-of-living crisis). These modern-day stressors in conjunction with changes to our living environments i.e., urban living and ‘nature-deficit’ environments (Louv, 2008), have been linked with chronic stress and mental ill-health (McMichael & Beaglehole, 2000).

Currently more than half of the global population live in an urban environment, and projected estimates are up to 68% of the global population by the mid twenty-first century (Kundu & Pandey, 2020). Urban living is associated with a variety of stressors (including environmental stressors) (Dye, 2008), and reduced access to natural spaces. In Britain, one in eight households have no access to a private/shared garden and black people compared to white people are four times as likely to have no access to a private outdoor space (ONS, 2020). Furthermore, UK policy recommends homes should be situated within 300m of an accessible green space (Natural England, 2008), as greater residential greenness is associated with lower levels of physiological stress (i.e., cortisol) and subjective stress (Gidlow et al., 2016; Roe et al., 2013).

Bright red lupins in a sunny well manicured garden
Accessible urban natural spaces for people with health conditions (Olivia Walsh)

The World Health Organisation recognises our environment as a significant determinant of our health (WHO, 2014). Natural environments such as green spaces (i.e., parks, woods, areas dominated by vegetation), and blue spaces (i.e., coastal, and inland waterways) have the potential to function as health promoting and health sustaining environments. Potential pathways connecting natural environments to health suggest three main areas: decreasing harmful impacts (e.g. reducing exposure to environmental stressors and pollutants), restoring capacities (e.g., stress recovery) and developing capacities (e.g., opportunities for physical and social activities) (Markevych et al., 2017).

Specifically in relation to stress, nature can provide us with the necessary resources for buffering, managing, and recuperating from stress through lowering subjective feelings of stress, decreasing physiological stress, increasing positive mood, and decreasing negative mood (Berto, 2014; Kondo et al., 2018).

To demonstrate, higher levels of nearby nature in residential areas in NYC were found to buffer the impact of life stress in children, with the greatest impact for children with highest risk (Wells & Evans, 2003). Similarly, being in nature (compared to exercise and social support) had the greatest effect for students affected by a life crisis, where higher degrees of nature experiences were associated with less crisis impact (Ottosson & Grahn, 2008).

Nature was also found to be an important resource for coping with and managing stress during the Covid 19 pandemic, in particular for those who were shielding or clinically vulnerable (Darcy et al., 2022; Labib et al., 2022). A diverse range of nature experiences were employed to support mental health and wellbeing, including indoor nature (Dzhambov et al., 2021), nature views (Soga et al., 2021), private garden spaces (Egerer et al., 2022), public natural spaces (Grima et al., 2020), and digital nature (e.g., social media challenges, webcam travel; (Lee et al., 2022)). Learning from this period highlights the importance of both private and public natural spaces in supporting health and wellbeing, with recommendations for use of public health messaging to promote nature engagement in any future public health crisis.

Two people measuring a space in a flower bed
Greencare courses in the community (Patricia Darcy)

Nature also can have a significant role in recovery from stress, where seminal research in this area found stress recovery was faster and more complete after exposure to natural environments compared to urban environments (Ulrich et al., 1991). Moreover, specific aspects or qualities of the natural environment may be integral to stress recovery (Grahn & Stigsdotter, 2010). For example, natural environments which are perceived positively (e.g., beautiful, safe, relaxing) and elicit positive emotions (e.g., happiness, awe) may be preferential in stress recovery (Korpela & Hartig, 1996).

To help conceptualise the relationship between nature and health and wellbeing, a continuum of nature engagement ranging from nature in our everyday life to more bespoke initiatives targeted at groups with defined needs, can be used.

Positioned at one end of this nature-health continuum is contact with nature in our everyday life (this may or may not be intentional or purposeful), for example, gardening, exercising in a park, or walking to work along a tree-lined street. Unstructured gardening activities have been shown to reduce stress and anxiety (Fjaestad et al., 2023), while park visits can reduce health anxiety in older adults (Dzhambov & Dimitrova, 2014). However, challenges associated with both access and use of urban parks for women, older adults, and those with health conditions has been previously highlighted, with recommendations for more inclusive decision-making and design of these spaces (Darcy et al., 2019).

At the centre of the nature-health continuum are health promotion initiatives aimed at the general public. These include exercise initiatives in natural environments (i.e., “Parkruns”), community and allotment gardening, and conservation projects. Parkruns have the potential to support positive mental health through reducing stress, where the free, largely low-competitive, social, and inclusive nature of Parkruns are central to participation and wellbeing impacts (Grunseit et al., 2020). Similar to research on the benefits of gardening during the Covid 19 pandemic (Darcy et al., 2022; Egerer et al., 2022), allotment and community gardening can be impactful in reducing stress (Van den Berg et al., 2010). Moreover, both ‘doing’ a gardening activity or just ‘being’ at an allotment can realise benefits through lowering subjective stress and supporting healthy aging (Hawkins et al., 2013).

Close up of some bright orange flowers in a pot
Private garden space during Covid 19 lockdowns (Olivia Walsh)

Finally, green care initiatives at the furthest end of the nature-health continuum consist of nature-based activities designed and developed for individuals with specific needs (Bragg & Leck, 2017), and are inclusive of activities such as care farming, animal assisted therapy, and social and therapeutic horticulture. These types of nature activities have shown positive benefits in addressing health and social care issues (Bragg & Atkins, 2016; Coventry et al., 2021).

Moreover, greencare initiatives delivered through Social Prescribing pathways (i.e., the provision of non-clinical services via a connecting referral pathway delivered by the community and voluntary sector to support users’ health and wellbeing) are referred to as Green Social Prescribing (GSP). GSP forms a central component of the UK government’s Covid 19 mental health recovery plan to transform mental health services and reduce demand on the health and social care system. In 2021, an investment of over £5.5 million was made to embed GSP in communities. Seven ‘test and learn’ sites were funded across England, one of which was the Humber and North Yorkshire Health and Care Partnership. This programme followed a cohort of adults with mild to moderate mental ill-health and found that participating in GSP activities (e.g., horticultural and care farming, conservation activities, exercise in nature) was associated with significant improvements in anxiety and depression. Moreover, GSP activities ranging from 5-12 weeks were found to have the greatest mental health and wellbeing benefits (Darcy et al., 2023).

In summary, nature has an important role in supporting our mental health and wellbeing through buffering and reducing stress and supporting stress recovery. Natural environments have the potential to act as health promoting and health sustaining environments by facilitating engagement with nature in our everyday life, supporting group-based health promotion activities in the community, and through the delivery of bespoke programmes tailored for specific health and social care needs.

Trish Darcy, Research Associate, Mental Health and Addiction Research Group, Department of Health Sciences, University of York

Staff Page

Natural Environments and Mental Health Research Theme


Berto, R. (2014). The role of nature in coping with psycho-physiological stress: A literature review on restorativeness. Behavioral sciences, 4(4), 394-409.

Bragg, R., & Atkins, G. (2016). A review of nature-based interventions for mental health care. Natural England Commissioned Reports, 204, 18.

Bragg, R., & Leck, C. (2017). Good practice in social prescribing for mental health: The role of nature-based interventions. Natural England.

Cohen, S., Janicki-Deverts, D., & Miller, G. E. (2007). Psychological stress and disease. JAMA, 298(14), 1685-1687.

Coventry, P. A., Brown, J. E., Pervin, J., Brabyn, S., Pateman, R., Breedvelt, J., Gilbody, S., Stancliffe, R., McEachan, R., & White, P. L. (2021). Nature-based outdoor activities for mental and physical health: Systematic review and meta-analysis. SSM-population health, 16, 100934.

Darcy, P., Armitt, H., Hurd, A., Paton, L. W., White, P. C. L., & Coventry, P. (2023). The Humber and North Yorkshire Green Social Prescribing Programme Cohort Evaluation.

Darcy, P. M., Jones, M., & Gidlow, C. (2019). Affective Responses to Natural Environments. Physical Activity in Natural Settings: Green and Blue Exercise, 124.

Darcy, P. M., Taylor, J., Mackay, L., Ellis, N. J., & Gidlow, C. J. (2022). Understanding the role of nature engagement in supporting health and wellbeing during COVID-19. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 19(7), 3908.

Dye, C. (2008). Health and urban living. Science, 319(5864), 766-769.

Dzhambov, A. M., & Dimitrova, D. D. (2014). Elderly visitors of an urban park, health anxiety and individual awareness of nature experiences. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 13(4), 806-813.

Dzhambov, A. M., Lercher, P., Browning, M. H., Stoyanov, D., Petrova, N., Novakov, S., & Dimitrova, D. D. (2021). Does greenery experienced indoors and outdoors provide an escape and support mental health during the COVID-19 quarantine? Environmental Research, 196, 110420.

Egerer, M., Lin, B., Kingsley, J., Marsh, P., Diekmann, L., & Ossola, A. (2022). Gardening can relieve human stress and boost nature connection during the COVID-19 pandemic. Urban Forestry & Urban Greening, 68, 127483.

Fjaestad, S. L., Mackelprang, J. L., Sugiyama, T., & Kingsley, J. (2023). Mental health outcomes associated with gardening: A scoping review. Cultivated Therapeutic Landscapes, 104-130.

Gidlow, C. J., Randall, J., Gillman, J., Smith, G. R., & Jones, M. V. (2016). Natural environments and chronic stress measured by hair cortisol. Landscape and urban planning, 148, 61-67.

Grahn, P., & Stigsdotter, U. K. (2010). The relation between perceived sensory dimensions of urban green space and stress restoration. Landscape and urban planning, 94(3-4), 264-275.

Grima, N., Corcoran, W., Hill-James, C., Langton, B., Sommer, H., & Fisher, B. (2020). The importance of urban natural areas and urban ecosystem services during the COVID-19 pandemic. PLoS ONE [Electronic Resource], 15(12), e0243344.

Grunseit, A. C., Richards, J., Reece, L., Bauman, A., & Merom, D. (2020). Evidence on the reach and impact of the social physical activity phenomenon parkrun: a scoping review. Preventive Medicine Reports, 20, 101231.

Hammen, C. (2005). Stress and depression. Annu. Rev. Clin. Psychol., 1, 293-319.

Hawkins, J. L., Mercer, J., Thirlaway, K. J., & Clayton, D. A. (2013). “Doing” gardening and “being” at the allotment site: Exploring the benefits of allotment gardening for stress reduction and healthy aging. Ecopsychology, 5(2), 110-125.

Kondo, M. C., Jacoby, S. F., & South, E. C. (2018). Does spending time outdoors reduce stress? A review of real-time stress response to outdoor environments. Health & place, 51, 136-150.

Korpela, K., & Hartig, T. (1996). Restorative qualities of favorite places. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 16(3), 221-233.

Kundu, D., & Pandey, A. K. (2020). World Urbanisation: Trends and Patterns. In D. Kundu, R. Sietchiping, & M. Kinyanjui (Eds.), Developing National Urban Policies: Ways Forward to Green and Smart Cities (pp. 13-49). Springer Nature Singapore.

Labib, S., Browning, M. H., Rigolon, A., Helbich, M., & James, P. (2022). Nature's contributions in coping with a pandemic in the 21st century: A narrative review of evidence during COVID-19. Science of The Total Environment, 833, 155095.

Lazarus, R. S., & Folkman, S. (1984). Stress, appraisal, and coping. Springer publishing company.

Lee, S. M. F., Filep, S., Vada, S., & King, B. (2022). Webcam travel: A preliminary examination of psychological well-being. Tourism and Hospitality Research, 14673584221145818.

Louv, R. (2008). Last child in the woods: Saving our children from nature-deficit disorder. Algonquin books.

Markevych, I., Schoierer, J., Hartig, T., Chudnovsky, A., Hystad, P., Dzhambov, A. M., de Vries, S., Triguero-Mas, M., Brauer, M., Nieuwenhuijsen, M. J., Lupp, G., Richardson, E. A., Astell-Burt, T., Dimitrova, D., Feng, X., Sadeh, M., Standl, M., Heinrich, J., & Fuertes, E. (2017). Exploring pathways linking greenspace to health: Theoretical and methodological guidance. Environmental Research, 158, 301-317.

McMichael, A. J., & Beaglehole, R. (2000). The changing global context of public health. The Lancet, 356(9228), 495-499.

NaturalEngland. (2008). Understanding the relevance and application of the Access to Natural Green Space Standard. Natural England, London.

ONS. (2020). One in eight British households has no garden.

Ottosson, J., & Grahn, P. (2008). The role of natural settings in crisis rehabilitation: how does the level of crisis influence the response to experiences of nature with regard to measures of rehabilitation? Landscape research, 33(1), 51-70.

Roe, J. J., Thompson, C. W., Aspinall, P. A., Brewer, M. J., Duff, E. I., Miller, D., Mitchell, R., & Clow, A. (2013). Green space and stress: evidence from cortisol measures in deprived urban communities. International Journal of Environmental Research and Public Health, 10(9), 4086-4103.

Soga, M., Evans, M. J., Tsuchiya, K., & Fukano, Y. (2021). A room with a green view: the importance of nearby nature for mental health during the COVID‐19 pandemic. Ecological Applications, 31(2), e2248.

Ulrich, R. S., Simons, R. F., Losito, B. D., Fiorito, E., Miles, M. A., & Zelson, M. (1991). Stress recovery during exposure to natural and urban environments. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 11(3), 201-230.

Van den Berg, A. E., van Winsum-Westra, M., De Vries, S., & Van Dillen, S. M. (2010). Allotment gardening and health: a comparative survey among allotment gardeners and their neighbors without an allotment. Environmental Health, 9, 1-12.

Wells, N. M., & Evans, G. W. (2003). Nearby nature: A buffer of life stress among rural children. Environment and Behavior, 35(3), 311-330.

More from University of York

More on:

Posted On: 01/04/2024

Website design and website development by Hello Technology in Whitby